The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Establish planning context and framework
|
|
Authority to plan is confirmed by legislation, direction, organisational or other managerial agreement Completed |
Evidence:
|
Planning environment is clarified by analysing emergency management plan drivers and risk assessments |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Legislative, regulatory and organisational requirements, policy, procedures, existing arrangements and plans impacting on the planning framework are identified and analysed |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Interests, sensitivities, roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders are identified |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Planning purpose, aims, objectives and governance frameworks are developed and refined with stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop agreed planning processes and methodology
|
|
A project scope is developed considering emergency management plan constraints Completed |
Evidence:
|
Processes for negotiating outcomes, making decisions, reporting, monitoring progress and quality are agreed, in accordance with organisational procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Consultation and communication plan is developed and implemented, in accordance with organisational procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Sources of expertise are identified to contribute specialised information and analysis, as required |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Emergency management plan structure is agreed in consultation with stakeholders, in accordance with organisational procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Project plan is prepared and approved in consultation with stakeholders, in accordance with organisational procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Undertake risk research and analysis
|
|
Project scope is reviewed in response to new information or changes in resources and planning environment Completed |
Evidence:
|
Analysis and research tools are used in developing emergency management plan |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Emergency risk information register is built or updated using credible emergency management sources |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Emergency risk management strategies are assessed |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Organisational vulnerability is determined by analysing susceptibility and resilience to risks |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Emergency management plan is confirmed as appropriate risk treatment |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Developand/orrefine planning parameters
|
|
Emergency management plan arrangements are reviewed or developed to identify potential gaps or duplication in roles and responsibilities Completed |
Evidence:
|
Emergency management plan strategies and tactics are identified and confirmed, in consultation with stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Resources and services including potential critical shortfalls are identified |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Financial and contractual arrangements for accessing or acquiring resources and services are developed, in accordance with organisational procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Arrangements for the command, control and coordination of emergency response or recovery operations are confirmed |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Contingencies to address potential problems are developed with relevant organisations and service providers, in accordance with organisational policies and procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Organisational implications of new or revised plans are identified and assessed |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Document emergency plan
|
|
Emergency management plan is iteratively developed in consultation with stakeholders Completed |
Evidence:
|
Emergency management plan is prepared, in accordance with organisational procedures and industry standards and is consistent with broader jurisdictional emergency management arrangements |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Language used is clear, concise and appropriate for documentation purpose and audience |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Planning records, supporting documentation and contact information is maintained, in accordance with organisational procedures and industry standards |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Validate and implement planning outcomes
|
|
Compatibility, links and interactions between the emergency management plan and other organisational documentation is reviewed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Specific benefits of the emergency management plan are promoted to stakeholders and other organisations to establish support |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor and review planning process and outcomes
|
|
Maintenance and audit schedule is implemented, in accordance with organisational policies and procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|
Deficiencies identified during audit, activation or implementation of the emergency management plan are analysed and are reported to authorised personnel |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Emergency management plan amendments are negotiated, documented and authorised, in accordance with organisational procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Opportunities for improving emergency planning processes are reported to authorised personnel |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|